.
Feedback

UC Regents Debate Tuition Increase

The UC Regents meeting continued today with discussions about raising tuition to help offset a budget shortfall of more than $1 billion.

For more than 220,000 students attending the 10 University of California schools, higher education may mean higher fees in the near future.

The UC Regents continued their three-day meeting today with a discussion about raising tuition fees to balance a budget reduction from the state of $650 million for the 2011-12 school year. The UC system also faces an additional $362.5 million in unfunded mandatory cost increases, according to the finance committee.

UC President Mark Yudof is recommending that 26.3 percent of the more than $1 billion budget shortfall projected for next academic year be offset by tuition and fee increases. Rates would be hiked by 9.6 percent, on top of a previously approved 8 percent increase also scheduled for the fall. The new rates would mean an increase of $1,818 from the 2010-11 figure, bringing the total cost of system-wide undergraduate tuition for California residents to $12,192 plus campus fees averaging $1,026. The total cost for an undergraduate to attend a UC campus would be around $31,000 annually, including room, board and books.

To cover the remaining 73.7 percent of the budget shortfall, UC Regents are considering cost-cutting and revenue-generating measures, including increasing administrative efficiency, streamlining financial management, expanding online education, reducing resident enrollment and increasing non-resident enrollment, among other strategies outlined in the budget report

The full meeting agenda and packets are available online through the University of California website.

An op-ed in the Sacramento Bee by Kyle Daley and Ian Magruder states that increased fees are "hard to swallow" for students and families who entered the UC system when the rates were lower.

"Students and families made calculated spending, savings and employment decisions based on assumptions for the cost of college that no longer hold true," write Daley and Magruder. Some students may be forced to drop out, which is "the cruel reality of the current policies."

Rather than risk losing students, the authors suggest a way to balance the scale: locked-in tuition. Read the full article here.

For real-time updates from the UC Regents meeting, follow UC Berkeley's Daily Californian on Twitter.

UC Berkeley student Darion Wallace told KTVU that her low-income family don't have the money to support a fee increase. "I'll have to make up that money on my own,” she said.

For background on the proposed tuition hike, read the release from the UC Newsroom or Yudof's response to the state budget update.

"This is not the first round of cuts we've faced in the ongoing fiscal crisis," said Yudof in the statement. "We have been engaged in a three-year exercise in coping with wholesale cutbacks, and by now the magic bullets all have been spent. What this reduction most likely would mean, as the governor noted, is the need to yet again raise tuition."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.