.
Feedback

BUSD Bullying Forum Draws Community Members

Residents discussed potential changes in school bullying policy.

Approximately 30 people gathered at the Saturday morning for a public forum on bullying organized by the Board of Education. A mixture of parents and school faculty and administration, along with a few interested community members, attended what amounted to a mass community brainstorm on how BUSD’s current policy on bullying could be improved.


Board member Leah Wilson, who serves on the board’s policy subcommittee, had received feedback from parents and worked with others in the school district to design avenues for further discourse, including Saturday’s event.

“This is the first of many such forums,” Wilson said, adding that there were many areas where policy was lacking or absent and could benefit from community input. There is also an Open Town Hall online forum at http://www.peakdemocracy.com/portals/30/715 where residents can share stories and leave comments.

Board president Beatriz Leyva-Cutler said the policy defined the term bullying “very minimally.”

“There is a need to adopt something more substantive,” she said.

Over half of the two-hour forum was spent in breakout sessions, where those in attendance were divided into four groups with a board member at each one.

Leyva-Cutler stressed that the forum’s focus should be on policy language rather than sharing individual stories, although board members would be open to further discussion of personal experiences through other means, including the Open Town Hall or direct e-mail.

Personal stories did leak out during the breakout sessions. One parent talked about a son who was ridiculed for wearing a fish hat to school. Another talked about how the Gay-Straight Alliance — or anyone that even associated with it — was ostracized by other children. One parent implored that everyone read the "Dear Colleague" letter released in October 2010 by the U.S. Office for Civil Rights.

The four groups reassembled afterward to share their suggestions for major points of change in bullying policy, with the vast majority of the discussion focused at the K-8 level. Many parents stressed the need for more proactive intervention, and a number of community members voiced strong support for more faculty training. Some attendees also felt that children needed to be educated on the full impact of their actions from a very early age.

“Kids should be able to say, ‘No, I don’t want to play with you right now.’” said Kristin Collins, principal of .

Residents also voiced concerns that the policy language was too punitive and did not account for a way to ensure that children who bully others reform their behavior.

Wilson added that since there is no scientific way of measuring bullying, she does not know the extent of bullying in the district.

The board will use its policy meeting on Thursday to outline a work plan. On the slate will be to examine privacy laws and other legal issues, as well as what areas fall under the board's jurisdiction. There is no projected date for policy revision.

“What we say here is not the beginning or end of that discussion,” said board member Josh Daniels.

Do you have suggestions for how schools can handle bullying? Tell us in the comments.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.