.
Feedback

School District Seeks Input on New Anti-Bullying Policy for Berkeley Schools

The Berkeley Unified School District has drafted a new anti-bullying policy and wants feedback from the community.

Bullying is a prevalent and ongoing issue across America, and while the act of bullying may be nothing new — the means and the focus have changed. New technologies have opened up a world of cyber bullying, and cultural shifts have made gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students a target

New problems require new solutions, which is why the Berkeley Unified School District is revising its anti-bullying policy. The first draft is now available on the district's website, with a request asking for feedback from the community. New anti-bullying policy for administrators is also available online. Both documents can be found on the right of this article, below the picture.

Back in June, to discuss what a new policy might include. The former anti-bullying policy was vague and defined bullying minimally, according to Board President Beatriz Leyva-Cutler, and the board needed to adopt "something more substantive."

Parents stressed the need for more proactive intervention and faculty training, as well as better education for students on the effects of bullying. Community members also shared their own experiences of bullying online in an open town hall.

"Bullying happens," wrote one commenter about Berkeley schools. "The environment for teasing is rich and complex and way off the radar and too insidious for most staff to recognize."

Every student in Berkeley has the right to a safe and secure school environment, according to district policy. Board members hope that the new policy will help to protect that right. 

The objectives of the new anti-bullying policy for Berkeley schools include:

  • Cultivating a culture of empathy, kindness, respect, and mutual trust among students and between students and staff
  • Creating a school climate which encourages students to disclose and discuss incidents of bullying, both in their roles as victims and bystanders
  • Demonstrating commitment to address incidents of bullying by outlining the school response to any such incidents of bullying

The draft defines bullying as follows:

Bullying means systematically and chronically inflicting physical hurt or psychological distress on one or more students or employees. It is further defined as: unwanted purposeful written, verbal, nonverbal, or physical behavior, including but not limited to any threatening, insulting, or dehumanizing gesture, by an adult or student, that has the potential to create an intimidating, hostile, or offensive educational environment or cause long term damage; cause discomfort or humiliation; or unreasonably interfere with the individuals school performance or participation; is carried out repeatedly; and is often characterized by an imbalance of power.

Cyber bullying is included in the updated list of bullying behavior, along with more traditional types of bullying — such as verbal, nonverbal, physical, emotional/psychological and acts of hazing.  

The administrative regulation document includes guidelines for reporting and investigating bullying claims, including cases that involve staff, teachers or administrators. The draft also outlines intervention and disciplinary options, as well as the requirement that each school site take preventative steps to thwart bullying, including educating students, staff, teachers, counselors and administrators "about what bullying is and why it is unacceptable."

Each school must also submit a yearly report on bullying, including all incident reports, details of preventative measures, a summary of the motivations for bullying, and information about the use and effectiveness of disciplinary actions.

For information about the signs and effects of bullying, as well as ways to prevent bullying or intervene, visit stopbullying.gov.

What do you think should be included in the new anti-bullying policy? Have your children been affected by bullying? How did school officials respond? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.