.
Feedback

UC Halts Purchase of Armored Truck

Chancellor says vehicle 'not the best choice for a university setting;' police say campus shootings prove otherwise.

An armored vehicle paid for with homeland security funds for use by three police departments will be making a U-turn.

The eight-ton truck has no place on campus, UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgenau said.

"Campus administrators evaluated the proposal and concluded that such a military-style vehicle is not the best choice for a university setting," Birgenau says in email message. "UC officials are in the process of canceling the order for the vehicle."

Had the tank rolled onto the campus as planned, Birgenau knew he could be looking at "endless demonstrations," Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates said. 

"I was really happy he came to the decision he did," Bates said.

Berkeley, Albany and UC Berkeley police departments teamed up as the North County Tactical Working Group to apply for a $170,000 grant from the Urban Areas Security Initiative to pay for the Lenco BearCat, which was approved. Berkeley police would have had access to the truck, but the university would have retained ownership.

The purchase did not flout any city rules, but nonetheless drew the ire of residents and Berkeley City Council members, who said it represented a militarization of the police.

Proponents say mass murders at Oikos University and Virginia Tech show access to an armored truck is, sadly, all too appropriate on college campuses.

The concern is "understandable," Birgenau says in his message. A gunman killed 32 and wounded 17 at Virginia Tech in 2007. A rampage at Oakland's Oikos April 2 left seven dead and injured three. 

"Obviously, the police department thought it would be a great tool to have at our disposal in a situation where we need to rescue police officers or the public from gunfire," said UCPD spokesman Lt. Eric Tejada.

"It's unfortunate, but we need to plan for that contingency, just as you plan for an earthquake," he said. "You hope it never happens, but in society today you have to be prepared."

Berkeley Police Chief Michael Meehan is on vacation and was not reachable for comment today. 

The council hammered police over the decision to place the truck on the campus.

"That is troubling to me given that last November the university was involved with the Alameda County Sheriff in beating protesters," Councilman Jesse Arreguin said. "I'm very concerned about the lack of safeguards to ensure people will not be negatively affected by this armored vehicle simply for exercising their First Amendment rights."

Tejada rejected the scenario.

"We never would have used it in a crowd control situation," he said. "That is not what a vehicle like this was made for.

Bates said that Oakland and San Francisco already have similar tanks, and that in the event of a crisis, "we could call upon our neighbors."

 

Follow us on Twitter | "Like" Berkeley Patch on Facebook | Get FreeBerkeley Patch Newsletters Blog on Patch.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
protests in Washington DC
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

protests in Washington DC
actors from Clerks 1 and 2
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

actors from Clerks 1 and 2
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.