.
Feedback

City Aims to Curb Loss in Parking Ticket Revenue

With a decline in the number of parking tickets issued in Berkeley over the past few years, the city hopes the creation of a new specialist staff position will help bring lost revenue back.

Although it may seem that a parking enforcement officer is never too far away in Berkeley, the city isn't handing out as many citations as it used to — and losing money because of it. 

The number of parking tickets issued in Berkeley has been declining over the past few years, according to city officials, resulting in revenue loss totaling more than $900,000 between 2009 and 2011, despite an increase in parking fines.

Last year, an average of 25 parking tickets were issued every hour in Berkeley. However, parking enforcement officers dealt almost 70,000 fewer parking tickets than in 2009. 


2009 2010 2011 Number of Parking Citations 285,865 234,288 216,413 Total Net Collections $10,029,602 $9,021,035 $9,098,431

The reason for the decline, according to city officials, may be a lack of consistency in the police department's parking enforcement division.

Currently, BPD rotates police lieutenants through the Traffic and Parking Bureau to manage the division, which officials claim has led to "inconsistent mentoring and coaching of parking enforcement staff, a lack of program/project management expertise, and the "lack of a dedicated resource that can assess and monitor the unit’s work."

To rectify the problem, Berkeley Police Chief Michael Meehan requested that the city establish a "Parking Enforcement Manager" position, with the goal of "strengthening" the parking enforcement unit. The new position was approved by the city council in Tuesday night's meeting and becomes effective Jan. 23. The application period and procedure is not yet clear.

According to the job description for the new position, the parking enforcement manager will "implement strategies for efficient staff deployment, and evaluate and recommend methods to increase revenue." The manager will also be responsible for:

  • Managing and administering programs
  • Researching and evaluating various parking models and trends
  • Gathering data, conducting analysis and generating reports
  • Identifying and applying for grants
  • Maintaining projects
  • Evaluating and planning the implementation of new technology and programs, such as the automated plate reader and
  • Acting as a liaison between the department and the public to address parking concerns

The parking enforcement manager will be a civilian position within the Berkeley Police Department with a salary between $5,503 and $6,755 per month. 

The city is projecting parking fine revenues to total $9.8 million in 2012, an increase of 7.8 percent over last year. In 2009, revenue from parking fines topped $10 million.

What do you think of the new parking enforcement manager position and the decline in parking citations over the last few years? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Lou Judson January 18, 2012 at 01:06 pm
Wow. Hire a new cop, great solution. Is there any chance people are paking better so they have had fewer violations? When was the last time a citizen expressed dismay that their illegally parked car did not get ticketed?
I live in Marin and work in Berkeley, and I can assure you Berkeley is more stringent on ticketing people - while they are at the machine putting money in to pay for parking! If they had only one machine per block, they could make even more that way. Pardon me for being snide, but I'm a bad citizen for not having had a parking ticket in Berkeley since 1974. I do give them $8 a day to park in an unsafe garage!
Marilyn Braiger January 18, 2012 at 02:24 pm
Hear Hear to the above. Berkeley, the bloated, does not need to add another level to its bureacracy. Why not lean and mean--comparing the size of Berkeley and its present staffing to other cities of like size suggests that inefficiency is the basic Berkeley plan. All no doubt based on the assumption that it is a city's responsibility to end social inequality by hiring willy-nilly, over-staffing at all costs, and making it impossible to recoup those outlays with a positive business climate.
searle whitney January 18, 2012 at 08:05 pm
I've lived and worked in Berkeley for 35 years and we need more inexpensive parking options, NOT more fines, spaces eliminated, residents added, or an extra level of bureaucracy to be paid for by higher parking fees and fines!
Vincent Casalaina January 18, 2012 at 09:05 pm
I wish I could say that I don't believe the story. Sadly I believe it's the way that Berkeley attacks most fiscal problems. How do we squeeze more money out of the residents of Berkeley?
It is truly sad when parking citations are looked at as a source of income rather than the stated reason for fines which is to keep cars from parking where they shouldn't (red zones and bus zones) or for too long (permit parking areas and meters). Let's hope that cooler heads prevail at City Hall and this goes away.
Lisa Cain January 19, 2012 at 12:08 am
Are they really NOT including information about parking meter revenues as compared to the past? And just using the citations data? The new meters that allow for credit/debit card use certainly make it much easier to pay (and pay for more than you might with quarters).
Robert January 19, 2012 at 02:21 am
Right on, Lisa. They should be showing both parking revenues and citation revenues, AND all corresponding costs. I'm not sure what *Total Net Collections* means.
Here's a source of citation revenues that seems untapped: delivery vehicles double parked, parked in bicycle lanes, parked in red zones, and blocking handicapped spots.
Paul D January 19, 2012 at 12:36 pm
Another waste of money and manpower. A new position to "implement strategies" to bring in more money to the city? How about eliminating the new position not spending the money in the first place. And what kind of strategy implementation and 'coaching' does it take to write up a parking ticket. More likely the new and hated electronic parking bandits are having a negative impact in people parking in metered spaces.
Farmer Zeke January 20, 2012 at 02:28 am
Perhaps the city would find revenue in enforcing actual TRAFFIC laws, i.e., moving violations, you know, the violations where bodily harm and/or property damage are a likely outcome, rather than the parasitic practice of slapping a ticket on a vehicle while the owner is in a store supporting the small businesses that are supposedly the heart and soul of the city.
It seems they's rather sneak up on an unattended vehicle than actually confront a driver caught in the act. And Lord knows there are PLENTY of moving violations to be enforced, from speeding, to not using signals, not stopping for pedestrians, running or rolling through stop signs.... the list goes on and on. Of course there are plenty of red light violations that get caught on camera, but again citations issued where the driver isn't directly confronted. Rather than ad more police, how about having the current crew do their jobs?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
ted friedman June 18, 2013 at 10:08 pm
The name is weirdly spelled, but not this weird. It's Caffe, not Caffee. I've only typed these wordsRead More a thousand times.
ted friedman June 19, 2013 at 11:06 am
Correction. Your Patch editor, Charles Burress is misspelled here.
ted friedman June 19, 2013 at 11:09 am
I could blame those cut-ups, typographers in the basement typing onto big circular steel plates