.
Feedback

Berkeley Police Chief Says Occupy Isn't Responsible for Peter Cukor’s Murder But Questions Remain

In town meeting tonight, Berkeley Police Chief Michael Meehan denied diverting resources because of the Occupy protest the night of the murder

Update: This article has been updated with Chief Meehan's response 

In a packed meeting hall at Northbrae Community Church, Chief Michael Meehan denied that his department diverted police officers from Peter Cukor’s house on the night of murder.

Cukor, 67, by a on February 23. At the time, a Berkeley police sergeant said that an officer was told not to respond to Cukor’s call because of an Occupy protest. This caused a stir from, as media outlets around the world picked up on the story.

But at tonight’s town meeting, Chief Meehan said this all this was untrue.

Speaking into a microphone, he told the audience, “First thing I want to do is read a few statements from the media. And I want to ask you, if you’ve heard these statements before. The police have blamed Occupy? Anybody hear that?”

The audience said, yes they’d heard those statements.

He then asked, “The police were kept on standby?”

The audience again affirmed they’d heard that.

Finally, he asked if they’d heard, “This could have been prevented if we’d allowed that officer to go up that hill?”

 Again, a resounding yes.

 “Not one of those things is accurate, or true,” Meehan said emphatically. “Not once did we say any of those things, in public or in private, to the media or anyone else.”

And yet on Tuesday, February 21, Lt. Andrew Greenwood of the Berkeley police department sent out a press release that started, “Greetings Media Colleagues.”

It went on to say that, “At [the time of the murder], available patrol teams were being reconfigured in order to monitor a protest march.”

Greenwood wrote, “only criminal, in-progress emergency calls were to be dispatched, due to the reduction in officers available to handle calls for service.”

The march Greenwood referred to was one where Occupy protesters were coming into Berkeley from Oakland.

“Concerns about the potential for violence associated with the march resulted in plans to allocate officers to monitor the march,” Greenwood’s press release said.

This would seem to strongly suggest that the Occupy march did in fact change what is normally the Berkeley Police Department's standard operating procedure.

But Meehan said the information had been inaccurately reported in the media, and then re-reported inaccurately many times over.

Meehan went on to say that he had about a dozen officers at the ready so that the Berkeley Police Department “would continue to have sufficient staffing to handle emergency calls.”

While there were some officers preparing to respond to an “f- the police” march, according to Meehan, the Berkeley Police Department “fully maintained the ability to respond to emergency calls.”

Correction: Andrew Greenwood is a lieutenant in the Berkeley Police Department. A pervious version of this article incorrectly identified him as a sergeant. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
protests in Washington DC
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

protests in Washington DC
actors from Clerks 1 and 2
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

actors from Clerks 1 and 2
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.