.
Feedback

BART Holds Hearing on New Law to Bar Problem Passengers

Officials with the transit agency say new authority to ban offenders will not be used to target homeless or mentally ill riders.

-By Bay City News

BART officials Monday night will hold the first in a series of three hearings on the implementation of new law that allows the transit agency to temporarily ban people who attack station agents or commit other offenses.

BART spokeswoman Alicia Trost said the impetus for the law came at a board meeting two years ago when station agents told directors that there had been an increase in violence, threats and hostilities against them.

She said that in one case a man pushed his way into a booth with a station agent and beat her severely. California Assembly Bill 716, which took effect last year, allows BART to issue a "prohibition order" against anyone who commits certain offenses on the transit district's property, such as violence against employees or passengers, defacing property or urinating in public.

Offenders can be banned for 30 days to a year, depending on the offense. For minor infractions a person must be cited on at least three separate occasions within a period of 90 days to receive a prohibition order but for more serious crimes, such as violence against passengers or employees, the ban can take effect after the first offense.

BART plans to begin implementing the law in May, following in the footsteps of two other transit districts who already have implemented it: Sacramento Regional Transit District and Fresno Area Express.

Assemblyman Roger Dickinson, D-Sacramento, who authored the state legislation, said the law has been successful in Sacramento and Fresno. Dickinson said in a statement, "With this new authority to keep serious and repeat offenders out of the BART system, now the riders and employees of BART will have the same opportunity for safer public transportation."

BART officials said they previously could go to the district attorney's office of a particular county where an offense occurred and seek a "stay-away" order and that continues to be an option. But they said because BART operates in multiple counties and the fact that stay-away orders aren't always higher priorities for prosecutors the new law is expected to be a quicker and more efficient way to deal with the problem.

Trost said the law contains safeguards to address concerns that the authority it grants could be misused. She said anyone who gets a prohibition order can request an administrative hearing at which the hearing officer can overturn the order if the person "did not understand the nature and extent of his or her actions or did not have the ability to control his or her actions."

Trost said BART officials want to emphasize that they don't plan to use the law to crack down on urinating by people who have special needs or are mentally ill or homeless but instead will focus on deliberate troublemakers.

BART officials will try to guide mentally ill or homeless people to public services, she said. Trost said the purpose of the public hearings is to get input from the public at large as well as mental health experts.

Monday's hearing will begin at 6 p.m. at the BART Board Room on the third floor of the Kaiser Center at 344 20th St. in Oakland.

The second hearing will be held at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday at the San Francisco Department of Health office at 101 Grove St. in San Francisco.

The final hearing will be at 6:30 p.m. on Feb. 28 at El Cerrito City Hall at 10890 San Pablo Ave. in El Cerrito.

Copyright © 2013 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
protests in Washington DC
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

protests in Washington DC
actors from Clerks 1 and 2
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

actors from Clerks 1 and 2
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.