.
Feedback

Judge Orders Psychiatric Exam for Man Accused of Rainbow Village Murders

The 1985 murders took place in a Berkeley homeless encampment.

-By Bay City News

A judge Thursday ordered a psychiatric examination for a man who was convicted of murdering two Grateful Dead followers at a homeless encampment in Berkeley in 1985 but recently won the right to a new trial.

Ralph International Thomas, now 58, is charged with murdering Mary Gioia, 22, and Greg Kniffin, 18, early the morning of Aug. 16, 1985, at the encampment near the Berkeley Marina, which was set up by the city of Berkeley and called the Rainbow Village.

The two victims were beaten and shot at close range with a high-powered rifle and their bodies were found later that day in the San Francisco Bay near the Berkeley Marina.

Thomas was scheduled to enter a plea today, but nothing has been simple in the long-running case, which has been the subject of numerous appellate rulings since he was convicted of two counts of murder plus the special circumstance of committing multiple murders and sentenced to the death penalty at his trial in Alameda County Superior Court in 1986.

Judge Carrie Panetta suspended Thomas' case after defense attorney Susan Walsh said she wasn't ready for him to enter a plea because she has concerns about whether he is competent to stand trial based on her recent conversations with him.

Three psychiatrists will now examine Thomas and their findings will be presented at a hearing in Panetta's courtroom on Nov. 15.

According to the evidence that was presented at Thomas' trial 26 years ago, Gioia and Kniffin were so-called "Deadheads," or followers of the Grateful Dead, and were staying at the encampment because a local Grateful Dead concert was expected the following weekend.

The evidence against Thomas was circumstantial, including evidence that he owned a rifle that could have been used in the murders, owned a corncob pipe found at the murder site near the Bay, and was seen with the two victims the evening before they were killed.

The California Supreme Court upheld Thomas' conviction and upheld his death sentence in 1992 and rejected a habeas corpus petition by a 6-1 vote in 2006.

The state court's 2006 ruling came after an Alameda County judge held a hearing earlier that year on a petition by Thomas' appellate lawyers that his defense lawyer during his trial, former Alameda County Assistant
Public Defender James Chaffee, failed to present witnesses who could have
cast doubt on whether Thomas was guilty and could have pointed to another
resident of the encampment as a possible suspect.

The Alameda County judge ruled that Chaffee had conducted an adequate investigation and even if he had located more defense witnesses it wouldn't have affected the outcome of Thomas' trial.

But U.S. District Court Judge Marilyn Patel on Sept. 9, 2009, overturned Thomas' conviction, ruling that Chaffee was incompetent and failed to locate witnesses who might have cast doubt on Thomas' guilt.

Former Alameda County Assistant District Attorney James Anderson, who prosecuted Thomas in 1986, blasted Patel at that time, calling her ruling "an abuse of judicial discretion" and "an outrageous bit of judicial jokery."

However, on May 10 a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, by a 2-1 vote, upheld Patel's ruling and order that Thomas have a new trial, saying that he didn't receive a fair trial.

Alameda County Senior Deputy District Attorney James Meehan said today that the California Attorney General's Office filed a petition last week asking the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the 9th Circuit's ruling and reinstate Thomas' conviction and death sentence.

Meehan said the petition alleges that Patel and the 9th Circuit panel acted improperly by ignoring the findings of the Alameda County judge who conducted the hearing on the case in 2006. He said his office will file a brief supporting the attorney general's petition.

However, Meehan told Judge Panetta that if the case goes to trial a second time his office won't seek the death penalty for Thomas again.

He said after today's hearing that the decision not to seek the death penalty at a second trial was based on Thomas' declining physical and mental health, his age and the age of the case.

Meehan said Thomas was diagnosed with dementia in 2009 and an examination revealed that he also suffered a brain injury from a stroke.

Thomas, who has a beard and is now balding, leaned over in his chair and spoke animatedly with Walsh in court before his hearing began today.

Prior to the 1985 deaths of Gioia and Kniffin in Berkeley, Thomas was convicted of 12 felony offenses, including kidnapping, rape, sodomy and armed robbery.

Meehan said the families of Gioia and Kniffin aren't happy that the case has dragged on for such a long time and at the prospect that Thomas will get another trial.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
protests in Washington DC
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

protests in Washington DC
actors from Clerks 1 and 2
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

actors from Clerks 1 and 2
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.