.
Feedback

Why Berkeley Should Support Action on Family Planning

Now that the Gates Foundation's London Summit on Family Planning is over, and with $2.6 billion in donor commitments to improving women's access to contraceptives, what next?

By Suzanne York, HowMany.org. 

At last week’s London Summit on Family Planning, a high-level gathering hosted by the Gates Foundation and the UK Department for International Development, donors pledged to provide $2.6 billion over the next eight years to help the world’s poorest women gain access to contraceptives.  It has been called a “breakthrough for the world’s poorest women and girls,” with more than 20 developing countries making commitments to increase spending on family planning.

It is impressive and encouraging, to say the least, that this meeting brought money and attention back to an issue that urgently needs more support.   The facts speak for themselves:

Ministers from developing countries also made commitments to improve family planning programs, including India, which pledged to have universal access to family planning by 2020 and Malawi, which will raise the minimum age of marriage to age 18.

Now the real work begins.  Post summit, next steps include ensuring that donors follow through on financial commitments and that family planning services get to the 120 million women targeted by this effort and who want it, and doing this with a rights-based approach.

Most importantly, providing access to contraceptives must be voluntary and based on choice, and all forms of contraception must be proven safe and reliable and be provided by trained professionals.  Above all, the world needs to listen to the voices of women and their families who want family planning services and not lose sight of the ultimate goal of empowering and  improving women’s lives.

Many organizations, activists and policy-makers have been following the work in the lead-up to the London meeting and will be continuing to keep a close eye on what transpires over the next eight years.

In the meantime, for those who work on women’s empowerment issues and reproductive rights, and really for anyone interested in bettering the world, it is exciting to have support from both developed and developing countries. When women’s lives are improved, we all win.

Here is a brief round-up of what was said in support of women’s rights and family planning from some top government officials around the world.

Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State:

Reproductive rights are among the most basic of human rights. But too often, in too many places, these rights are denied. Millions of women and young people in developing countries don’t have access to information to plan their family. They don’t have health services and modern methods of contraception. This is not only a violation of their right to decide the number, timing, and spacing of their children, it’s also a question of equity as women everywhere should have the same ability to determine this fundamental part of their lives.

Yoweri Museveni, President of Uganda:

As leaders, we must rededicate ourselves to women’s and reproductive health. Women do not only give life – they are the backbone of the economies in the developing world. The issue of population in Africa must be put in proper context and discussed accurately without complacency, exaggeration or panic.

David Cameron, UK Prime Minister:

Women should be able to decide freely and for themselves whether, when and how many children they have. It is absolutely fundamental to any hope to tackling poverty in our world. 

Rajiv Shah, Administrator, U.S. Agency for International Development:

Alongside critical investments in education and economic opportunity for women and girls, voluntary family planning paves the way for peaceful, more prosperous communities. Ultimately, we know that long-term, sustainable development will only be possible when women and girls enjoy equal opportunity to rise to their potential.

Paul Kagame, President of Rwanda:

This collaboration is important because it seeks to meet the needs of the society, that in this case is the market…citizens, therefore, should set the pace and direction of family planning. Rwanda considers the ability to properly manage one’s own family size as a basic right. 

Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City:

Making affordable contraceptive information, services, and supplies available to an additional 120 million women and girls by 2020 will save 200,000 lives that would have been lost to pregnancy or childbirth.

Now is the time to put these words into action and support women and men in making informed and voluntary choices in what family planning services works best for them.

This article was originally posted at www.populationgrowth.org.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.