.
Feedback

Seafood Insecurity

One billion poor people around the world rely upon fish and seafood as their primary source of protein. Climate change is putting these people at high risk for food insecurity.

By Suzanne York. Original article posted at 6DegreesofPopulation.org

One billion poor people around the world rely upon fish and seafood as their primary source of protein. Climate change is putting these people at high risk for food insecurity, and they also face a very serious threat to their livelihoods as fisherfolk, according to the recent report Ocean-Based Food Security Threatened in a High CO2 World.

Authored by Oceana, an international organization working to protect the world's oceans, the publication states that “Emissions from human activities are changing the ocean’s chemistry and temperature in ways that threaten the livelihoods of those who depend on fish and seafood for all or part of their diets.” Ocean acidification (chemical changes in the ocean as a result of carbon dioxide emissions) is also a major factor, and is upsetting the balance of marine life.

By 2050, when global population is projected to hit 9.3 billion (a mid-range UN estimate), the world demand for seafood – unsurprisingly – is also expected to rise. The report's authors believe that oceans can be a big factor in addressing the global food security challenge. Yet the reality is that carbon emissions and other greenhouse gases are “disrupting ocean conditions and threatening the future of the essential food resources we receive from the oceans.”

Today, an estimated 41 percent of the world’s population lives within 100 kilometers of the coast, including 21 of the world’s 33 megacities, consuming an increasing amount of food from the ocean and contributing to climate change.

Using the indicators of low gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, high population growth rates and high levels of undernourishment, Oceana's top five “least adaptable” countries are Comoros, Pakistan, Eritrea, Haiti and Madagascar.

The implications of this, regarding not only world population growth, but also economic development and environmental sustainability, are huge. Take Pakistan, for example. Today it has a population of 180 million; by 2050, it is projected to reach 314 million. This growth will have big implications on food and water security. In Pakistan, fisheries are a key economic sector and reap billions of dollars of foreign exchange for the country; there are also a large number of both rural and urban communities dependent upon fisheries for livelihoods. A decline in fish and seafood catches would hit the poorest fisherfolks the hardest (already they face competition from industrial trawlers).

And in Madagascar, which has one of the world's fastest growing populations, there are many people dependent upon fishing for their livelihoods. Any disruption to fish stocks would severely affect them.

The NGO Blue Ventures is helping remote communities in Madagascar cope with population and environmental pressures by working with locals to manage coastal marine areas. It has also opened regional family planning and health care clinics to address the unmet need for family planning services and bring down the number of births per woman, which currently stands at five. Vik Mohan, medical director with Blue Ventures, said that a t-shirt was designed to help make the links between population growth, environment, and resources which noted that if people have too many children there won't be enough fish.

Fisheries and aquaculture support the livelihoods of an estimated 540 million people, or eight percent of the world population, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization. Thus, maintaining healthy oceans is critical. Oceans cover over 70 percent of the Earth’s surface and contain the planet’s largest habitat, nearly 99 percent of the living space on the planet. That area supports the life of nearly 50 percent of all species on Earth.

The U.S. National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration emphasizes the vital role of the oceans biological productivity in the global climate and carbon cycle and provides nearly 50 percent of Earth's oxygen and 20 percent of the world's protein supply. Fish comprise approximately 12 percent of marine species, and crustaceans, such as crabs, lobsters, comprise slightly less than 20 percent of all species in the ocean.

The Oceana report lists steps that can be taken to minimize impact. These are 1) reduce carbon dioxide emissions, 2) end fossil fuel subsidies, 3) stop overfishing, bycatch and destructive fishing practices, 4) establish marine protected areas, and 5) manage for change (manage resources sustainably in the face of climate changes).

Humans have relied upon the oceans for food for thousands of years. That reliance has been mainly taken for granted, but today too many of us are consuming unsustainably in a world of gross inequity. Throw population, pollution, acidification and climate change into the mix and we need to find ways to quickly reduce negative human impact on the oceans and planet.

 

Suzanne York is a senior writer with the Institute for Population Studies/HowMany.org

 

(photo: The Waxhead, http://www.flickr.com/photos/waxhead/4327288871/in/photostream/)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
protests in Washington DC
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

protests in Washington DC
actors from Clerks 1 and 2
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

actors from Clerks 1 and 2
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.