.
Feedback

Putting Women and Reproductive Rights on the Agenda in California

The recent Women's Policy Summit in Sacramento highlighted the critical need to prioritize and protect women's health and reproductive rights and justice in California.

By Suzanne York. Original posted at 6degreesofpopulation.org

 

Last week, at the Women's Policy Summit in Sacramento, promoting women's issues took center stage for a day.

An impressive array of California advocates, activists, legislators and others gathered for a conference dedicated to “Advancing Women's Health, Wealth and Power”. One of the main themes of the day was healthcare – especially the impact of health reform and the federal Affordable Health Care Act (ACA) on women in California.

Susan Berke Fogel, Director of Reproductive Health at the National Health Law Program stressed the urgency of getting the 2.7 million women in California who are currently uninsured into full healthcare coverage. Health reform, Berke Fogel said, “is about reaching out to these women.” Those with the highest rates of not having insurance? Younger women, single women, and lower-income women.

Below are the top three policy recommendations for legislative action at the Women's Policy Summit:

  • ensure comprehensive health coverage for all of California's women and girls;

  • ensure access to comprehensive family planning and other preventative services in public and private health insurance;

  • address reproductive health disparities by bringing a gender lens to HIV and STI prevention, coverage, treatment, and education.

 

(A gender lens is defined as “assessing the implications and impacts of gender from an initiative's conception through all aspects of design, analysis, piloting, partnership, staffing and implementation through to evaluation, dissemination, taking to scale and assessment of policy implications.”)

One of California's most innovative and successful programs addressing reproductive health and family planning is Family Planning, Access, Care and Treatment (Family PACT). Julie Rabinovitz, CEO of the California Family Health Council, called it the “most successful family planning program in the country”. It was enacted in 1996 to reduce the rate and cost of unintended pregnancy, increase access to publicly funded family planning for low-income Californians, and increase the use of effective contraceptive methods.

The most recent statistics available show that an estimated 286,700 unintended pregnancies were averted in California, which amounted to a savings of $1.88 billion in public sector costs. This program alone serves nearly 2 million low-income women, men, and teenagers.

According to the California Coalition for Reproductive Freedom, a consortium of organizations working on reproductive rights, the components that make Family PACT a model program include the following: on-site enrollment, immediate access to services, a large network of public and private providers, coverage of all FDA-approved contraceptive methods, and reproductive health education and counseling.

Many of the speakers at the session on Reproductive Health, Rights & Justice focused on policy recommendations. One of the main policy objectives of reproductive rights advocates in California is to preserve Family PACT, for the reasons stated above, and to maintain current funding levels. Despite the program's success, Amy Moy of California Family Health Council said that incoming state legislators and all state officials need to know the importance of maintaining it. Even with the Affordable Care Act and Family PACT, it is estimated that between two to four million Californians will be uninsured in 2019.

A second recommended policy action is to pass legislation to protect confidential access to sensitive services (namely sexual and reproductive health care but also treatment for mental health issues and substance use) for insured dependents. Under ACA, an insured dependent is covered up to age 26, certainly considered the age of an adult. If confidentiality is weak or lacking, some minors and young adults may forgo services such as birth control and screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, for fear that a parent or guardian may find out.

Current law on sensitive services has gaps and also lacks clarity and clear definitions. The burden is put on the insured dependent to opt-in to confidentiality protections. Moy said that guaranteeing confidentiality “takes the burden off the patient to have to ask for non-disclosure.” Advocates are calling for requiring automatic non-disclosure when insured dependents age 26 or under seek sensitive services.

What is clear is that despite successful program like Family PACT, despite the Affordable Care Act fully coming into force January 1, 2014, despite past great leadership by Californian legislators and others supporting women's rights, empowerment, and access to healthcare, we cannot sit on our hands and assume all is well. We must continue to push for reproductive rights and justice and support healthcare for all. The state of California faces many budgetary hurdles, but all effort must be made that our newly elected legislators understand the importance of reproductive issues so no one gets left behind.

 

Suzanne York is a senior writer with the Institute for Population Studies

 

(photo credit: http://www.elephantjournal.com)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
protests in Washington DC
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

protests in Washington DC
actors from Clerks 1 and 2
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

actors from Clerks 1 and 2
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.