.
Feedback

Focus on Women and Rights in Berkeley and Beyond

The world must make a big push to invest in voluntary family planning services.

By Suzanne York, www.howmany.org

July 11 is World Population Day, and there are reasons to be hopeful that the subject of population, along with empowering women, will be attracting more positive attention and obtaining more positive results.

We are very excited about the London Summit on Family Planning, sponsored by the Gates Foundation and the UK Department for International Development. The world needs to get behind really investing in voluntary family planning services by making contraceptives more affordable and accessible, with a steady supply, and increase R&D for better and safer contraceptives.

The goal of the gathering is to give 120 million women in the world's poorest countries access to family planning information, services and supplies by 2020, and to raise $4 billion to do so.

It's hard to fathom that something that is known to be a cost-effective strategy to reduce unwanted births, abortions and maternal deaths (not to mention to reduce our CO2 emissions and our demands on our environmental resources) is so underfunded and controversial. Yet between 1995 and 2007, financial investment in family planning programs fell by 65% – from $980 million to $340 million.

The Guttmacher Institute recently reported that 222 million women in developing countries want to avoid pregnancy, but lack effective contraception. And in 2012, it is estimated that 80 million untended pregnancies will be in the developing world due to contraceptive failure and non-use among women who do not want a pregnancy soon. Whatever the outcome in London, family planning services should meet this need and provide a wide selection of methods at a cheaper cost for women and their families.

There has been some concern directed at the London Summit by human rights and women's rights groups. They want to ensure that expanding contraceptive access is done with “full respect for women's human rights”. On the surface any attempt to bring voluntary family planning services to those who desire it is a great thing, but given the dark history of coercive population measures, everything possible should be done to ensure that efforts undertaken today are based on complete choice without any coercion.

A separate declaration by civil society groups emphasized choice, stating “We recognise the need for urgent action to increase women and men's access to a broad range of contraceptives, which is essential for free and informed choice, and increased use of FP” (family planning). Many eyes will be watching the summit closely and making sure the results are positive.

On a related note, in the wake of the disappointment at the UN Rio+20 conference – that is, leaving reproductive rights out of the official text due to Vatican opposition – this is something activists and civil society can campaign on and link to sustainability. In the closing day of the Rio talks, a Danish minister for development cooperation called for just that, saying omission of reproductive rights “has created a campaign here in Rio that hasn’t been seen” and more and more people will be standing up for these rights.

Lastly, as we reflect on World Population Day 2012, it is important to bring more men into discussions and outreach efforts. For family planning efforts to be completely successful, men and boys need to be educated and involved as well as women and girls.

Talking about population is unfortunately a contentious issue, but it doesn't have to be so. If choice, voluntary measures, improved education and access, inclusivity, interconnectedness, and rights-based and holistic approaches are made the norm, then the world should be able to come together for the sake of women, families, and the planet. Empowering women and striving for universal access to family planning services would result in healthier families, improved gender equality and social equity, more food security, opportunities for better economic livelihoods, poverty reduction, and a more sustainable environment.

Hopefully the Gates Foundation can get governments, foundations, and the private sector to support family planning and reproductive rights and deliver what women want and need, not just what developed countries think they should have. Simply having this summit is a wonderful step forward towards raising global awareness.

Perhaps the most important point to remember is that women's rights are human rights and reproductive rights are central to this. And when women are empowered, the world wins – both people and the planet.

Original article posted atwww.populationgrowth.org

Suzanne York is a senior writer with the Institute for Population Studies/HowMany.org

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
protests in Washington DC
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

protests in Washington DC
actors from Clerks 1 and 2
Speak Out  

0   Recommend J M

actors from Clerks 1 and 2
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.