.
Feedback

Berkeley, Ideas, and How to Really Talk About Population Growth

To positively address global population growth, we need to hear from the grassroots and not corporations. Some suggestions here for the Aspen Ideas Festival and other conferences.

By Suzanne York, www.howmany.org.  

This was my first time attending the annual Aspen Ideas Festival (AIF), and what a week it was! Suffice it to say, my head still hurts from all the information I took in from some of the country’s top thinkers and doers. From the polarization of U.S. politics to the Supreme Court’s healthcare decision to education, people are genuinely looking for answers and talking about ways to best tackle today’s pressing issues.

The Aspen Institute, especially its Global Health and Development Program, should be congratulated for including a conference theme called “Our Planet: 7 Billion and Counting”. Putting population issues front and center is rarely done these days, and the fact that AIF devoted a week of sessions to this topic is encouraging for those concerned about the intersection of population growth, the environment, and women’s rights. Peggy Clark, with Aspen Global Health and Development, has an excellent grasp of the issues and brought in some top-notched people to talk about population and women’s rights. Her program has done much in the past year to underscore the importance of reproductive health as a human right and a key to sustainable development.

That said, despite best intentions, the population piece was only partially included in most of the sessions. The two best were “The Politics of Sex” and “Sustainability Redux”, of which more can be read about here. And Dennis Dimick, executive editor with National Geographic, gave a good overview of the “Population Challenge” session, linking the issues of population growth and resource scarcity, based on the magazine’s recent year-long focus on a world of 7 billion. Encouragingly, he mentioned the importance of educating girls and noted the “Girl Effect”, a video on how supporting girls is a main solution to overcoming social problems.

However, other sessions seemed to miss the point of stabilizing population growth. One session titled “The Role of Business in Addressing the 9 Billion” was a one-on-one talk with Doug McMillon, president and CEO of Walmart International.

Most people who are very concerned about the environment and a planet headed towards 9 billion people by 2050 would probably not expect a Walmart exec to be keynoting such a discussion. While McMillon never said so, it is my belief that Walmart wants very much to reach 9 billion, because to them that represents 9 billion consumers. Companies want to increase profits and customers, not decrease. Even though Walmart understands the impacts of an unsustainable world, especially resource scarcity, they probably don’t necessarily equate that with fewer people. They just want to have more shoppers.

The very next day was another one-on-one session, this time with Marvin Odum, the president of Shell Oil in North America. His topic was “The Earth in 2050: The Nexus of Food, Energy and Water”. Most of the time was spent talking about Shell’s pending drilling for oil off the coast of Alaska. Little was said about population and the human impact on food, energy, and water resources, despite the title.

This is not to say the private sector shouldn’t be involved in population growth issues. Its input and innovation is crucial too, and the best solutions will involve all sectors. For AIF, though, a little more balance with grassroots organizations would have been more effective. The voices of those who are “on the ground” working directly with women and their families to improve lives need to be heard. There are amazing women and men working tirelessly to build healthy families, communities, and environments all over the world, in developing and developed countries. Many of them have the ideas and inspiration that more people need to hear. Blue Ventures, PHE Ethiopia Consortium, and Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC) are just a few that come to mind.

And if the Aspen Ideas Festival really wants the heavy hitters, Melinda Gates, Mary Robinson, Gro Harlem Brundtland and Kavita Ramdas are doing exceptional work. Ramdas just penned a compelling article on why we should be talking about sex and contraception and why this is important for society and the environment; her efforts should be brought to the attention of the AIF organizers.

Given the often pervasive reluctance to address the nexus of population, the environment and reproductive rights, I’m thrilled that the words “seven billion” made it onto the schedule at all. Despite the above concerns, kudos to the Aspen Institute for bringing it into the discussion. Population affects almost everything, as more than one AIF participant told me. People get it, and want to know how to talk about the issue. A few less words from Corporate America and a few more from global activists would be a start, and maybe, just maybe, that will be on the agenda in 2013.

You may view selected population sessions from AIF on its website.

Suzanne York is a senior writer with the Institute for Population Studies/HowMany.org. This column was originally posted at www.populationgrowth.org

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
nick mastick April 28, 2013 at 09:34 pm
Of all the concerns in our society, I put this just about dead last.
Steven Murphy April 17, 2013 at 02:25 am
Hmm. So I think you're telling me I need to add the countdown timers to the long list of BerkeleyRead More idiosyncrasies I need to ignore? I guess can do that. Thanks. --Murph
Alexander Sinclair Merenkov April 15, 2013 at 04:34 pm
This is very interesting. I bicycle and walk a lot around Berkeley. I think i know exactly whatRead More signal is being referred to the walk sign across Bancroft at MLK specifically will reset itself. many of the walk signals rely on induction loops which are loops placed in the ground that can detect Bicycles and Cars when the Bicycles or cars pass over them disrupting the current. You can often see these loops as they look like hexagonal saw cuts in the ground. Anyways the intersection detects traffic with these devices & if it doesn't detect anything then it assumes nothing is there and gives right of way to the major throughway in this case being MLK. So the reason the counter to cross Bancroft resets itself is totally logical because the intersection suspects no one is there and since that side of Bancroft is more or less residential there would be no point in setting that intersection to a timer where it gives priority to one light then the other & switches based on that & not on wether it detects any bicycles or cars passing over the induction loops. Also this is Berkeley and we are rather quirky and always have been so nobody exactly fallows the rules or knows about them its funny how simple crossing the street really is but its anything but simple in reality. Many people choose to jay walk if its safe to do so, this is typical on Shattuck at alston especially and makes sense for efficiency but isn't very safe or lawful. If the hand is flashing/Counting down dont cross!
Janet Scrivener April 6, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Actually, I just saw and spoke to him about an hour ago - the wire sculpture man. He'd moved downRead More Solano a few blocks, opposite Safeway. I asked him if the police had moved him off Colusa. He said he didn't want to talk about it. He wasn't in a very good mood. I told him that people had asked about him on a web local news site. He said, "People want to know how I'm doing? I need a car. I need somewhere to put my stuff in. To get off the streets. I don't want to sit around starving in public." I thought to myself, "Who do I think I am? A Girl Scout leader? Pollyana?" I realized my upbeat, cheery tone was really not what was needed just then. I said I couldn't help him with a car. "People want to know how I'm doing?" he said again. "Tell them that." I said, "I will." I turned to walk away, knowing only too well that the real needs that exist, yes, right here in our lovely, excellent neighborhood, are great and once you start giving you'll find it's difficult to get out of. He did say, "Thank you," as I left. He doesn't look like he's starving. But he's right about being out in public more than he would like to be. As a reasonable human being, I have to ask myself, what sort of person finds himself in that position? Ex con? Mental illness? Mind-blown Vet? Drugs? Alcohol? Incapacitated by an accident? An unforgivable act? Some combination of the above? Jesus did say, "The poor you shall have always with you." What would you do?
P. Park April 4, 2013 at 03:29 am
I agree Shattuck, especially right in front of the fire station is the scariest street around.
Mary April 3, 2013 at 06:45 pm
I am not disabled, but I am terrified of crossing streets nowadays because there are too manyRead More careless and aggressive drivers who act is if red lights, speed limits, and crosswalks either don't exist or don't apply to them. Shattuck in particular has become a nightmare to cross. Sometimes I have counted over 30 cars going by before one stops for the crosswalk. What we need is far more law enforcement - the tickets written would more than pay for the cost of hiring extra officers.