.
Feedback

Spare the Air Alert Issued for New Year's Day

Due to potential poor air quality in the Bay Area, indoor and outdoor fires are banned on Jan. 1 for 24 hours.

They aren't asking this time. 

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has issued its first Winter Spare the Air Alert of the 2012 season for Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013. Burning wood, manufactured fire logs or any other solid fuel — either indoors and outdoors — is banned for 24 hours.

The ban — making it illegal to light a New Year's Day fire — has been put in place to avoid trapping pollutants in atmosphere, according to the district. Cold, still weather conditions due to continue through mid-week cause air to cool close to the ground, creating an inversion layer of warmer air above, explained the Bay Area Air Quality Management District in a press release. In windless conditions, wood smoke and other pollution can get trapped under this lid of warm air can and build up rapidly to unhealthy levels.

"Sitting by the fire during the holidays may conjure up fond memories, but it’s important that everyone forgoes burning during this alert so we can all enjoy a happy, healthy holiday," said Jack Broadbent, executive officer of the Air District in the release.

The district says that exposure to wood smoke — as with cigarette smoke — has been linked to serious respiratory illnesses and even increased risk of heart attacks. Breathing fine particles or soot accounts for more than 90 percent of premature deaths related to air pollution, according to BAAQMD.

It is illegal for Bay Area residents and businesses to use their fireplaces during a Spare the Air Alert. Woodstoves and inserts, pellet stoves, outdoor fire pits, or any other wood-burning devices are included in the ban. An exemption is available for residents and businesses that burn wood as their sole source of heat and have no other permanently installed heating source, according to the district.

Before lighting a fire during the Winter Spare the Air season, which runs from November 1 through February 28, check to ensure that no bans are in place. Find the daily burn status: 

Wood smoke is the largest source of wintertime air pollution in the Bay Area, according to BAAQMD, and contains harmful pollutants such as particulate matter and carbon monoxide, as well as toxins which are linked to increased cancer rates in adults. In the winter, wood smoke from the 1.4 million fireplaces and wood stoves in the Bay Area contributes about one-third of the harmful particulate pollution in the air.

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (www.baaqmd.gov) is the regional agency responsible for protecting air quality in the nine-county Bay Area.

kp miller January 1, 2013 at 02:16 pm
The wind has been blowing consistently and strongly at my house in the Berkeley Hills since late yesterday. It isn’t “still” by any means. On days like this in particular, I question whether the declarations by the BAAQMD have much basis.
Albert Spruce January 1, 2013 at 03:57 pm
I wondered about that too. It has been breezy all morning in El Cerrito. Now 3+ mph out of the ESE. It'll probably calm down as the day warms up and we get stasis between night/morning offshore flow and the later sea breeze. BAAQMD apparently calls Spare the Air days based on forecasts, but doesn't seem to have any way to call them off if the forecasts turn out to be wrong.
Mark Kay January 1, 2013 at 04:47 pm
Of course, government agencies are "bad" in some people's opinion. Such people should form their own societies and see how they fare with no regulations , etc. BAAQMD just wants to monitor and improve the air quality for all, even people who prefer not to be affected by their neighbors use of archaic technologies.
John Stashik January 1, 2013 at 06:25 pm
BAAQMD has 350 staff members on the payroll. The agency is clearly good for those folks.
Mark Kay January 1, 2013 at 07:05 pm
I have no knowledge of the pay or benefits of this agency....but I do believe people deserve a fair wage, regardless of who they work for. What I do know is as far as feeding off the public trough goes, the PUC is most deserving of reform. Lets start there in complaining about unethical public "servants."
Kathy A. January 1, 2013 at 07:19 pm
I grew up in L.A., and among the many reasons I was glad to escape to the Bay Area is the far better air quality. We do not generally need wood fires for warmth; it is not that much of a sacrifice to avoid them on days when they might particularly affect our neighbors.
(Unlike the southern US, we also do not generally burn stuff to get rid of it. My son's worst asthma attack was after they burned a lot of eucalyptus on Angel Island, about 1995, and the wind blew this way. It was a less expensive means of disposal, but not for us. My son's symptoms were so bad that the ER was not enough, and he spent 3 nights in the hospital. I like to think that was a lesson learned, because I don't recall something that stupid happening since.) The idea of a regional district is wonderful. It encompasses all 9 counties -- and those include places with a lot of traffic, various industries, etc. 350 staff for a professional operation spanning 9 busy counties (needing to monitor, plan, make scientific assessments, coordinate with other agencies, and work with businesses) does not sound terribly oversized. On average, that is fewer than 40 workers per county. Our own county is rather large, and contains a number of industries, including refineries. I prefer for BAAQMD to be on the job when Chevron has a whoopsie -- and before then, too!
kp miller January 1, 2013 at 09:35 pm
Wow. I’m a well-informed, fairly intelligent person who reads that the BAAQMD has ruled this a no-burn day because conditions are “still” and in such situations pollutants in smoke can be trapped in an inversion layer, causing serious air quality issues. Sounds reasonable to me. HOWEVER, the wind is blowing like mad at my house so I question the basis of the agency’s decision. To one reader that somehow means I’m anti-government? That’s just silly. Questioning authority is a good thing. More to the point, I share Mr. Spruce’s curiosity about how or if the BAAQMD withdraws a no-burn ruling when the weather conditions change.
GlenShannon January 1, 2013 at 10:29 pm
I wrote to them and asked why it was in effect despite the windy conditions. I should hear back in 5-7 days (!)
Alex Gronke (Editor) January 1, 2013 at 10:56 pm
Thanks @GlenShannon. Let us know what you learn.
Mark Kay January 1, 2013 at 11:26 pm
Seems like some people are taking this way too personally! If the forecasts end up being incorrect and the burners can't burn their fires, it seems less harmful to our community than having air quality lowered and thus adversely affecting people with breathing problems. My daughter's breathing vs. your cozy fire? No contest.
By the way, does this remind anyone else of the days when non-smokers had to endure cigarette smoke in public places?? That was a long process but eventually the right to breathe won over any one person's right to pollute.
Mark Kay January 1, 2013 at 11:27 pm
And by the way, I believe tomorrow is also a no-burn day.
Dover January 1, 2013 at 11:39 pm
Hmmm, one wonders whether you consider the burning of coal to be an "archaic technology." Or do you classify coal produced power as one of 'dem dere' new-fangled technologies?
Eighteen percent of PG&E's power is produced by the burning of coal but I bet that doesn't bother you as you are not actually next door to one of the plants, right? And who cares if said plants emit millions of tons of CO2 every year as long as you can continue to live in a bubble of sanctimony and pretend they don't exist, right? Viva la arrogancia! Viva!
Diane January 2, 2013 at 06:06 am
Thank you BAAQMD for sparing the air.
Alan Eckert January 2, 2013 at 02:34 pm
L.A. as in Los Angeles? It seems to me that the air quality is notoriously worse in LA than many (if not most) parts of the country. Every stock photo I see of smog in the US seems to be of Los Angeles.
Alan Eckert January 2, 2013 at 02:37 pm
These decisions are made in slight advance. If the weather shifts or changes after the announcement, then it is better that the Spare the Air remain in effect than to put out mixed messages.
Susan January 3, 2013 at 12:52 am
some of us use our wood burning stoves at a main source of heat. I, for one, do not have a heating system (haven't for years) and have a newer model wood insert. As it happens, people like me are exempt from the penalties. The point is, some of us DO need to burn wood for heat!
Susan January 3, 2013 at 12:54 am
I also think that comparing having a wood fire in your fireplace is NOT comparable to smoking cigarettes in public. This is my house and I live here. And while I am not a smoker, I still have the right to smoke in my HOME. My home is built to the building codes, legal, insured, and not a hazard to the public. I do have a right to heat my home.
vcnbvmnbm,n January 3, 2013 at 11:38 pm
http://www.coachoutletonlinebfd.com Coach Factory Outlet
http://www.guccibeltstb.com Gucci Belt http://www.coachoutletonlinetdy.com Coach Outlet Online http://www.cocoachoutletonline.org Coach Online Outlet http://www.coachoutletonlinetsy.net Coach Bags Outlet

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Berkeley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
ted friedman June 18, 2013 at 10:08 pm
The name is weirdly spelled, but not this weird. It's Caffe, not Caffee. I've only typed these wordsRead More a thousand times.
ted friedman June 19, 2013 at 11:06 am
Correction. Your Patch editor, Charles Burress is misspelled here.
ted friedman June 19, 2013 at 11:09 am
I could blame those cut-ups, typographers in the basement typing onto big circular steel plates