patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Mother Claims Alleged Attacker Daniel Dewit Neglected by the Mental Health System

The mother of a 23-year-old man who is accused of beating a Berkeley hills homeowner to death said today that he's been mentally ill for more than four years but was neglected by the mental health system.

 

By Bay City News

Candy Dewitt, the mother of Daniel Jordan Dewitt of Alameda, said her son became mentally ill after he turned 18 but she was never able to get him into a permanent treatment program."He would be taken to the hospital and given treatment for a fewdays at a time and then be put back out on the streets again," Dewitt said.

Berkeley police arrested Daniel Dewitt Saturday night for allegedly killing Peter Cukor, 67, who lived on Park Gate Road near the Shasta Road entrance to Tilden Park.

Cukor owned a consulting company that provided logistics help for the transportation industry. According to the company's website, Cukor had an undergraduate degree in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a doctorate in chemical engineering from the University of California at Berkeley.

Berkeley police said they initially received a report on Saturday night of a suspicious person who possibly was trespassing on the homeowner's
property. They said they later received a call of an attack in progress on
Park Gate Road and immediately responded.

The victim was treated at the scene by the first police officer who responded before being taken to a local trauma center by Berkeley Fire Department paramedics, police said. He was pronounced dead at the hospital.

Dewitt is scheduled to be arraigned in Alameda County Superior
Court on Wednesday. The District Attorney's Office is still reviewing the
case and hasn't yet filed any charges.

Candy Dewitt said her son graduated from Alameda High School in
2007 and played on the school's football team. She said, "He was a good kid and was very well-liked by his teachers and other students."

Dewitt said that because the mental health system neglected her
son, "They have now made victims of two more people," referring to the
homicide victim and her son.

Berkeley City Councilwoman Susan Wengraf, whose district includes
the area where the homicide occurred, said she's asked police for a detailed
timeline of what happened Saturday night because "there has been a lot of
innuendo."

Wengraf said, "People who live in the area initially were very frightened and rightfully so because it was a horrendous crime and everyone was very shaken. But she said, "It's now looking like this was an isolated incident and a very unique incident and this is not an unsafe area so everyone is feeling a little better."

Wengraf said police have told her that Dewitt wasn't armed with any weapons and "he seemed confused and was hiding in the bushes."

Cukor and his wife, Andrea Cukor, filed a lawsuit to try to block
the construction of a new Berkeley fire station at 3000 Shasta Road, which is
across the street from their home.

In November of 1992, a year after a major fire caused widespread damage in the Oakland and Berkeley hills, Berkeley voters overwhelmingly approved a $55 million bond measure to fund critical improvements for disaster preparedness, including a new fire station.

Berkeley officials said the new station would replace another aging station nearby and provide quicker response times to fires. The Cukors' suit blocked the new station for many years but on Nov. 5, 2003, a judge ruled in favor of the city and in 2004 the new station was approved by the city's zoning board and the City Council.

The fire station finally opened on Oct. 31, 2006.

Related Topics: Candy Dewitt, Daniel Dewitt, Peter Cukor, and north Berkeley murder

Lou Judson

6:44 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012

MIssing from this article is the commen from yesterday's article that the 911 call from the vitim's wife was not responded to by BPD. PLEASE unvestigate this, as the plot thickens. Perhaps Mental Health AND BPD are culpable fot invol manslaughter?

Patch, Look into it will you?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lou Judson

6:46 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012

pardon the typos. I am upset at official incompetence.

Tanya Jo Miller

8:09 pm on Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Hey Lou...it seems it was about 17 minutes in total..here's what BDP said about the timeline:

At approximately 8:45 PM, BPD received a report of a suspicious person possibly trespassing. The caller reported an encounter with an unknown person “hanging around” his property, and asked that an officer be sent to investigate. This call for service was queued for dispatch.

At that time, available Patrol teams were being reconfigured in order to monitor a protest march which was to come into Berkeley from Oakland in the next hour. Only criminal, in-progress emergency calls were to be dispatched, due to the reduction in officers available to handle calls for service. Concerns about the potential for violence associated with the march resulted in plans to allocate officers to monitor the march.

At approximately 9:00 PM, an officer, seeing several pending calls for service, including two “suspicious circumstances”, offered to respond to either of the calls. The officer’s offer was declined, as only in-progress emergency calls were to be dispatched.

Two minutes later, at approximately 9:02 PM, BPD received a phone call reporting an attack in progress. The previous call information was updated and officers were dispatched within one minute.

Reply

Tim Q. Cannon

9:51 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

I'm glad you live in Marin too Lou...we already have enough kooks here...the BPD has my confidence, and I've lived here my whole life...they even arrested me once (back in the '70's), and treated me very respectfully. Get the facts straight.

Reply

Tanya Jo Miller

10:21 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Howdy folks. it's a complicated issue and reasonable minds can disagree but we try to keep it civil here at Patch. Thanks in advance.

Reply

Vincent Casalaina

10:42 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

I'm concerned that the writer of the article didn't address the issue of why the young man was released from the hospital and put on the streets. As I understand the law, it is illegal in California for a person to be committed without their consent unless they pose an immediate danger to themselves or others.

The mother's statements don't address the issue of whether her son was an immediate threat. Since he was over 18, there's not much the mental health people could do, other than to treat him for 72 hours and release him.

This is a clear case where we need additional rule making from the California Supreme Court. They were the ones who said it was illegal to hold someone against their will in order to treat them.

Reply

lesley turner

11:36 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Another question raised is if the victim lived across the street from the firestation, how can it be that no one arrived in time to save him. The article wasn't very thorough. Other things could have been happening at the time, but I am left wondering

Reply

Tanya Jo Miller

10:44 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

@lesley. You probably know this by now, but the firefighters were on a call at that time Peter Cukor stopped by.

Reply

Leave a comment